Lord and Lady Macbeth: House of Cards’ Ambitious Marriage

For those of you who have jumped on board the Netflix bandwagon, it’s likely that you’ve in some way been exposed to its new creative venture in the Netflix-only series House of Cards featuring Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright (that’s right people – Princess Buttercup is back!) And if you’re not a Netflix subscriber, well, it’s seriously worth the $8 a month for this show alone (we in no way represent the company, by the way).

First off, SPOILERS ahead!

While my inner geek would love to get into the details of the monologues, the Shakespearean asides, the even more Shakespearean invocation of absent deities (why, oh why has Kevin Spacey never played Iago?) and the corrupt depiction of Washington politics, I want instead to open up some dialogue about the central marriage of the series. Spacey’s Congressman Francis Underwood is married to Wright’s Claire Underwood, who works for the Clean Water Initiative (a wonderful satire of the highly-politicized nonprofit industry in Washington). The couple have no children, both work long hours, and Francis openly cheats on his wife with a young journalist. This is hardly a description of a perfect marriage – in fact it is so cliché as to sound downright boring.

Except for one key element: this is arguably the most egalitarian marriage I have ever seen portrayed in a series. Claire is very good at playing her Congressman’s Wife role: she is fit (like, ridiculously), clever, blonde and dedicated to her husband’s plans. But here’s the catch – she is quite happy to use him as a prop to her own career as much as he uses her. In fact, the two are both very open about it with each other, sharing some very candid conversations about their ambitions and schemes. Their feelings and desires are mutual (at least during the first half, roughly, of the show), and it is especially jarring to see Spacey’s southern gentleman of a politician treat his wife with such respect. Every stereotype in the book sets Claire up to be the virtuous, ignorant, maltreated wife, treated poorly by her sod of a husband. But instead, she joins him in his political manoeuvres – and hell, more than that: he joins hers!

It’s true this equality doesn’t last all season, and the relationship becomes a little more complicated as the series progresses. But the stage has already been set: by the time the couple start experiencing trouble, Claire is already an established schemer in her own right. When the young system-bucking journalist comes into play, Claire confronts her with her own knowledge. Her line “my husband and I tell each other everything” is chilling because it reduces Zoe to a pawn in the games the husband and wife play. Zoe assumes that Claire, like most wronged wives, knows nothing of her and Francis’ relationship, right up until the moment that Claire swings into her apartment and rather harshly disabuses her of this notion. While there are indications that Claire is actually more emotionally invested than she lets on, this statement serves as a reminder that this is no shrinking violet – this is a woman who plays at the same top levels as her (admittedly genius, if craven) husband.

I’m not suggesting that this is a perfect example of a couple. Rather, this iteration of House of Cards (the original was a 90’s British Drama) is deeply cynical about the corruption in politics perpetuated by types like Francis and Claire. But I am, nonetheless, impressed to see a marriage where, to put it as simply as I can, Lady Macbeth gets as much credit as Macbeth for bringing down the castle.

Tags: , ,

3 Responses to “Lord and Lady Macbeth: House of Cards’ Ambitious Marriage”

  1. Pam June 10, 2026 at 5:54 pm #

    I like your musings about the relationship in House of Cards, and I agree that Claire’s motivations are equal to her husband’s. However, something stops me from saying that the power dynamic is fully egalitarian. I think to some small degree at least, Claire thinks she is equal to her husband more than she actually is so, as is seen in the way she slowly loses leverage as the relationship progresses and frequently gives up more than she gets in return to her husband. Case in point for her power trip at the journalist’s apartment- why go and display such an aggressive show if not out of insecurity? And she, unlike her husband, feels a recurring conflict between having married for love and running away with her lover, while he cheats with impunity and feels no conflict between the roles of husband and playboy. I think while I would really like to think she is just as powerful and confident as her husband, I think the fact that we are so hungry to see a strong female character, and we are so inured to the more subtle and longstanding gender inequalities of society, that we are so quick to believe she is truly equal.

    • Pam June 10, 2026 at 5:56 pm #

      *married for power

  2. Caitlin June 11, 2026 at 6:14 am #

    Hi Pam thanks for your comment! You raise a good point as to the diminishing equality in their relationship. It does seem like the power dynamic shifts in Francis’ favour as the series progresses. I do wonder though if Francis’ relative impunity with regard to having his affair is because both he and Claire are aware of it and, in fact, plan it. Conversely, Claire’s affair is unplanned and comes as a surprise to her husband.

    Seems like there’s still a ways to go, and I think you’re right - we are hungry for a truly egalitarian model of marriage! Netflix take note!

Leave a Reply


*

Submit a story!